What type of dispute is likely to result from omission or non-action?

The type of dispute that is likely to arise from omission or non-action is an assumption-based dispute. This kind of dispute typically occurs when there is a disagreement concerning what was implicitly understood or assumed by the parties involved in an agreement or context.

When one party fails to act or omits necessary actions based on assumptions made by the other party, it can lead to misunderstandings and conflict. For example, if one party assumes that a responsibility will be fulfilled by another and that responsibility is neglected, a dispute can emerge over the expectations that were not clearly outlined or agreed upon.

This contrasts with other types of disputes, such as commission-based disputes, which usually involve actions taken that result in disagreement. Contractual disputes arise from breaches or misunderstandings of explicit terms within a formal agreement. Third-party disputes typically involve external parties affected by the actions or omissions of the primary parties involved, rather than arising from the direct interactions between the main parties themselves.

Thus, assumption-based disputes specifically capture the essence of conflict driven by omissions or failures to act based on perceived agreements or expectations.