According to the Principal of Consistent Use, how should land and buildings be allocated?

The Principle of Consistent Use emphasizes that the allocation of land and buildings should be unified in their intended use. This means that a specific use should be assigned to both the land and the building, ensuring that they complement each other in terms of functionality and purpose.

When one use is allocated to the land, it should be consistent with the use assigned to the building on that land. For example, if a piece of land is designated for residential use, the building constructed on that land should also be for residential purposes. This consistency prevents conflicts that might arise if the building's use were to differ significantly from the intended use of the land, leading to inefficiencies or regulatory issues.

In contrast, the other choices suggest scenarios that do not align with the principles of land and building use. Independent uses may lead to discrepancies that could render either asset underutilized or misaligned with zoning regulations. Complementary uses are beneficial, but they are not an absolute requirement according to the principle; rather, it’s the avoidance of contradictory uses that is emphasized. Flexibility in usage can be valuable, but it does not inherently support the consistent alignment of the land and building’s designated purposes. Thus, the correct understanding lies in ensuring that the use of land and buildings